🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.